Dan_Millsip said:
You're using the resources of the community by being there (roads, water, etc)*****
Not really. I think road funding is either provincial or federal so I don't think I'm "consuming their resources..." just by driving there. I live in a large city where most of the tax money is generated to begin with, and so having roads built way out into the sticks could be seen as being a consumption of MY resources, and hence shouldn't they be subsidizing my activities, not vice versa --- I know, that's bullshit but I was just making a point about how it's all how you choose to look at things
I bring my own water and etc with me, and even if I didn't, if you're asserting that I should give somebody money because I put a few liters of water into a container, you're overvaluing water in my humble opinion.
If the choice is between pay parking or a vandalized vehicle obviously the choice is pay up. But not only is this NOT the case at least in most remote places I've experienced, but it's only recently that this money grubbing, pay-parking trend has really put the screws to folks. It didn't used to be that way. I dove at Telegraph Harbor in the late 70's (the octopus at 90 feet is still there, apparantly), and nobody gave a damn where you parked. Now, it's laughable the way every centimeter of roadside is so exhaustively staked out with these "YOU MUST PAY..." signs. It must have cost a fortune just for all the signs. It turns me off, and many of my friends feel the same way and simply don't go there at all.
Sadly, this is probably just the thin end of the 'money-grubbing' wedge, and in a while, all of the out-of-the-way little spots will be similarly staked out.
If I was better off financially (I'm on a medical disability pension, that explains my need for frugality, sad to say) I'd be generous with it, too.
If you can afford to do all that and still go 'yakking --- good for you. It must be nice.