Stick on the 3' long 1"x1" skeg pc I suggested in the other thread and see if that settles everything down. Then glue a shaped one on with G-flex. Simple, but oh oh, not a rudder!
Mac50Lwrote:
a weak link somewhere is . . a good idea
The mounting bolts might be best.
But I agree, your welded Tstructure is stable and extra construction is redundant . . . but if it had been built any other way, the simple pin engagement modification would aid in stability. Did any of the commercial manufacturers you mentioned utilize the T-head?
**
So all these Slot Rudders: Lettman, Lightspeed, Venture, Islay, Pietsch, Thomasson, Fiberline [and probably more]. . . . And this group are all hunt and peck: the rudder design itself will not self-align the blade so that it will automatically align itself to the ‘slot’ upon retract or especially impact.
[venture] peck, peck, peck, ahh retract.
Some users employ an indirect method by having the rudder pedals either bungeed forward or made of stiff flexible material that always returns to centre when pressure is released, but your feet have to be off and the lines have to be balanced, firm and tight so that the rudder is stable and straight where you want it. But this system obviously is acceptable and workable enough for a big enough proportion of paddlers for them to be catered to by having this option.
The advantages of the ‘hunt and peck’ Slot Rudder are quite seductive:
- The first and most important is its inherent simplicity: it is no more complex than any other rudder plus a housing. The hardware essentially consists of that housing, a hinged blade, a rudder shaft, and a tiller plus the 3 or 4 lines to steer and retract it as any other rudder has. As the housing connects the hull to the deck, it is a contained system and no additional leak points exist.
- They are hidden [mostly – some expose tillers] below the deck level so that cowboy mounts, towing, and line entanglements won’t happen.
- Aesthetically they allow clean kayak lines
- When retracted, damage possibilities are minimized.
- When retracted, aerodynamic and hydrodynamic drag is minimized if not eliminated.
- Aesthetically they don't require the back of sharp ended or narrow kayaks to be cut off vertically just to allow a transom mount
And yet they all portray different characteristics: some have extremely tight slots [one even only 2mm wide – one heck of a lot of pecking there!], one with a massive depression. Some have narrow blades, some rounded, some long and narrow. Some have thin shafts, some wide. Some with tight post tolerances right to the bottom of the hull and some with large leeway around the rudderpost bottom.
Why all the variation? Is it irrelevant? Or put it this way – are some of them missing something or all of them in one way or another. Are there secrets missed? What are the disadvantages?