SWriverstone
Established Member
Okay, here I go again with another random technical question (thanks for your patience!)...
Regarding rudders, I've often heard of one rudder or another being "hydrodynamic." This is a term I've always been dubious of...because I've seen it applied to rudders that appear to have no design features that make them any more "hydrodynamic" than another rudder that doesn't bear this label. So I wonder: what exactly makes a rudder "hydrodynamic?"
Also, because we all know hull stiffness makes a difference in the speed of a kayak (a softer, flexible hull won't be as efficient), doesn't this same rule apply to a rudder? Example: isn't a stiff metal rudder blade going to turn more efficiently than a plastic rudder blade that flexes?
Also: most kayak rudders I see are generally just made from a piece of plastic or metal that is a uniform thickness, e.g. the edges all the way around the blade are the same thickness and squared off. It would seem that to make a rudder "hydrodynamic" you'd want the leading edge of the blade (that's in the water) to be tapered...or maybe rounded (like an airplane wing)? But I don't think I've ever seen a kayak rudder blade designed like this.
And is there any advantage to rudders that are elliptically shaped and rounded on the bottom...versus rudders that are rectangles or parallelograms and squared off on the bottom?
Is "hydrodynamic" just a BS marketing term?
And one final thing I'm pondering: shouldn't rudders for bigger/longer kayaks be bigger? (Wider, or longer, or both?) won't the longer/wider boat require more turning power to produce the same "snappy" rudder turn as a shorter kayak? I ask because most rudders I see seem to be a single, generic size. (Which may be because a 1-3 foot length difference in boats really doesn't mean anything to a rudder?
Regarding rudders, I've often heard of one rudder or another being "hydrodynamic." This is a term I've always been dubious of...because I've seen it applied to rudders that appear to have no design features that make them any more "hydrodynamic" than another rudder that doesn't bear this label. So I wonder: what exactly makes a rudder "hydrodynamic?"
Also, because we all know hull stiffness makes a difference in the speed of a kayak (a softer, flexible hull won't be as efficient), doesn't this same rule apply to a rudder? Example: isn't a stiff metal rudder blade going to turn more efficiently than a plastic rudder blade that flexes?
Also: most kayak rudders I see are generally just made from a piece of plastic or metal that is a uniform thickness, e.g. the edges all the way around the blade are the same thickness and squared off. It would seem that to make a rudder "hydrodynamic" you'd want the leading edge of the blade (that's in the water) to be tapered...or maybe rounded (like an airplane wing)? But I don't think I've ever seen a kayak rudder blade designed like this.
And is there any advantage to rudders that are elliptically shaped and rounded on the bottom...versus rudders that are rectangles or parallelograms and squared off on the bottom?
Is "hydrodynamic" just a BS marketing term?
And one final thing I'm pondering: shouldn't rudders for bigger/longer kayaks be bigger? (Wider, or longer, or both?) won't the longer/wider boat require more turning power to produce the same "snappy" rudder turn as a shorter kayak? I ask because most rudders I see seem to be a single, generic size. (Which may be because a 1-3 foot length difference in boats really doesn't mean anything to a rudder?

